Two animal activists who were convicted for their role in a 2019 protest at an Abbotsford hog farm will have an appeal of their sentences heard on Friday (May 31) in Vancouver.

Amy Soranno and Nick Schafer of Kelowna are hoping to have the B.C. Court of Appeal set aside their 30-day jail sentences and re-sentence them to either a conditional discharge or a conditional sentence, which could include house arrest.

The pair were among four people initially charged in relation to a protest on April 28, 2019 at the Excelsior Hog Farm. The group 含羞草研究社� who dubbed themselves the 含羞草研究社淓xcelsior 4含羞草研究社� 含羞草研究社� faced a total of 21 charges.

Charges against Geoff Regier were later stayed, and Roy Sasano was acquitted at trial.

Soranno and Schafer, who are spouses, were convicted in July 2022 of one count each of break-and-enter and sentenced in October 2022.

They appealed their convictions on the basis that the trial judge erred when he wouldn含羞草研究社檛 allow the jury to see video footage obtained from hidden cameras that showed the alleged mistreatment of animals on the hog farm.

The cameras had been placed by members of the Meat the Victims group, to which Soranno and Schafer belonged.

The B.C. Court of Appeal in January of this year upheld the convictions. Soranno and Schaffer have since filed an application with the Supreme Court of Canada to appeal that decision.

Meanwhile, they are appealing their sentences.

RELATED:

In a press release issued Monday (May 27), the pair alleged that Soranno was 含羞草研究社渦nceremoniously cut off含羞草研究社� during her 2022 sentencing hearing and told by Justice Frits Verhoeven that 含羞草研究社渢his is not the platform for you.含羞草研究社�

含羞草研究社淎ccording to the appeal brief, Verhoeven denied Soranno her 含羞草研究社榳ell-entrenched right to speak before being sentenced含羞草研究社� and additionally deprived the court of information relevant to her sentencing,含羞草研究社� the press release states.

The appeal brief states that the judge含羞草研究社檚 actions were 含羞草研究社渃ondescending, dismissive and illegal.含羞草研究社�

含羞草研究社淪oranno and Schafer argue that Justice Verhoeven also erred by deciding their beliefs and morals were irrelevant to their culpability, a claim underscored by Verhoeven含羞草研究社檚 decision to use their political goals as a reason to impose a custodial sentence, basing it on denunciation and deterrence,含羞草研究社� the release states.

Soranno states that the judge 含羞草研究社渃an含羞草研究社檛 have it both ways.含羞草研究社�

含羞草研究社淥ur reasons for engaging in non-violent civil disobedience is either relevant to our case or it含羞草研究社檚 not. We believe that exposing animal cruelty is a social imperative and highly relevant to our sentencing,含羞草研究社� she said.

Soranno and Schafer are planning to hold a press conference and rally outside of the B.C. Court of Appeal on Friday at 9 a.m. The hearing is scheduled to start at 10 a.m.

RELATED: