To the editor:

Re: Online Off-leash Dog Park feedback.

I am disappointed that Kelowna city staff has made two crucial errors in two sentences on their home page for dog parks and then created a huge mess and wasted taxpayers money and time trying to correct the errors.

The form says: 含羞草研究社淧lease note, Q.6 [(http://www.kelowna.ca/CM/Page269.aspx)]: 含羞草研究社淭he best management practice minimum size for an off-leash dog park is 0.4ha (as per the American Kennel Association). This is the approximate size of the Mission Recreation Off-leash Dog Park.含羞草研究社�

含羞草研究社淭hat is not the approximate size of Mission Recreation Dog Park, Mission Recreation Dog Park is 0.72ha. Knox Mountain Off-leash Dog Park is closer at 0.38. We apologize for the error. The question will not be included in the final report and the open ended responses will be used anecdotally. 含羞草研究社�

Three mistakes in five sentences does not give me confidence the city knows what they are doing about off-leash parks.

The first error is 含羞草研究社淭he best management practice minimum size for an off-leash dog park is 0.4ha (as per the American Kennel Association).含羞草研究社�

I have downloaded and read the document: 含羞草研究社淓stablishing a Dog Park in Your Community,含羞草研究社� by the American Kennel Club. (and attached it to this email) I have searched the document for the  words: 含羞草研究社渂est management practice minimum size.含羞草研究社� Those words do not exist in that document.含羞草研究社� In fact the words, 含羞草研究社渂est management practice含羞草研究社� do NOT appear in that document.

The actual words in the document, from page 17 are: 含羞草研究社淭he ideal dog park should include one acre or more of land含羞草研究社�含羞草研究社�

There is a huge difference between 含羞草研究社渋deal含羞草研究社� and 含羞草研究社渂est management practices.含羞草研究社� Ideal leaves room for options. Best management practices leaves no room for change or options because any change would be going against best management practices.

The second error relates to 含羞草研究社淭his is the approximate size of the Mission Recreation Off-leash Dog Park.含羞草研究社� This blatantly untrue as another letter to the editor writer pointed out. To correct this second error, the city staff has apologized for the error and made the correction to the page. What they did not do is change question #6 inside the survey, which still reads: 含羞草研究社�0.4 ha (approximate size of the Mission Recreation Off-leash Dog Park).含羞草研究社�

By correcting the second error on the front page and not in the survey, the staff  has created the third problem: There are only four choices for the size of the off-leash park with .04ha being the largest size.  For respondents who chose 含羞草研究社榦ther含羞草研究社� and used the open response area and asked for larger off-leash parks especially for larger dogs, the city staff have decided: 含羞草研究社淭he question will not be included in the final report and the open ended responses will be used anecdotally.含羞草研究社�

So what was the point of asking citizens to give their thoughtful opinion and ideas about the size of the parks, off leash areas and new water park areas of dogs when the city staff has already decided that the off-leash parks won含羞草研究社檛 be larger than 0.4 ha which they have unilaterally and incorrectly decided is 含羞草研究社榖est management practice含羞草研究社�?

Guardians of goldens, labs, Bernaise, Aussie sheperds, border collies and mixed breed dogs who use the large dog off-leash parks, already know 0.4 ha park is not large enough to include both large breeds and small breeds nor is it large enough for large breeds to exercise when there are 10 or more large dogs present.

If the city council decides on our off-leash dog park size based on this survey, it has not solved the problem. Even worse, if there is even the slightest chance that the words 0.4 ha (approximate size of the Mission Recreation Off-leash Dog Park) were used in the 含羞草研究社渟tatistically valid telephone survey含羞草研究社� which taxpayers are paying money to conduct, then all that money has gone to waste too. I would hope the city council will verify the questions in the survey they含羞草研究社檙e paying for and ensure only correct information is contained in that survey.

I encourage the city councillors and staff responsible for off-leash parks to come to Central Green (Richter/Rowcliffe) and Mission Creek Park off-leash parks when it含羞草研究社檚 busy with dogs and guardians: 7 to 9 a.m. and 3:30 to 5:30 p.m. Talk to the dog guardians about what is needed for large dogs off-leash areas.

Bring your open mind and a note book and learn about the 含羞草研究社榓necdotal含羞草研究社� ideas we have to create better off-leash dog areas, not just parks, for both small and large dogs. Make our 含羞草研究社榓necdotal含羞草研究社� stories part of your decision making process.  Oh, and if you含羞草研究社檙e coming to the Central Green off-leash area, you may have trouble parking. The Christmas trees are still blocking part of the parking area.

Marilyn Strong,

Kelowna