Kelowna property owners with a short-term rental business licence will be allowed to keep operating when new provincial rules take effect on May 1, 2024.

That was the result of a 4-3 vote at city council含羞草研究社檚 regular meeting on Monday (Jan. 15).

含羞草研究社淭he existing licences that are in place, which is 498 of them, we will allow those to exist at this point,含羞草研究社� said Mayor Tom Dyas.

The close vote was the result of tough debate amongst council.

含羞草研究社淚 hear regularly from the public how frustrated they are that we can含羞草研究社檛 bring the bad players under control and we don含羞草研究社檛 seem to have the tools in our toolbox,含羞草研究社� said Coun. Luke Stack. 含羞草研究社淚 think that含羞草研究社檚 why the province has jumped in and said if you guys can含羞草研究社檛 fix it at the municipal level we含羞草研究社檒l take a crack at it because we have a bigger toolbox.含羞草研究社�

Provincial legislation defines short-term rentals as any accommodation provided to the public for less than 90 consecutive days and restricts them to a homeowner含羞草研究社檚 principal residence.

Kelowna含羞草研究社檚 bylaw is more restrictive, less than 30 days, banning short-term rentals as a principal or secondary land use in mixed-use and residential zones with few exceptions.

READ MORE: B.C.含羞草研究社檚 new short-term rental regulations approved after colourful debate

Staff recommended that 498 currently licenced secondary use short-term rentals be allowed to continue operating in Kelowna, even after May 1, with a 含羞草研究社榣egally non-conforming含羞草研究社� status, provided they meet provincial principal residence requirements.

含羞草研究社淎re we putting more people on our streets, out of their homes and back into the rental market if we go more restrictive than the province has?含羞草研究社� asked Coun. Gord Lovegrove.

Coun. Rick Webber said council must balance what is best for the community as a whole.

含羞草研究社淚n listening to the discussion today the argument seems to be will this get more people into homes or will it force a lot of people out of their homes. That含羞草研究社檚 a hell of a question to answer, and there is no obvious answer.含羞草研究社�

A four-and-a-half-hour public hearing on the matter in November 2023 saw about 200 people pack council chambers. Staff estimate there are approximately 1,200 short-term rentals operating without a licence in Kelowna.

READ MORE: Kelowna residents 含羞草研究社榟eard loud and clear含羞草研究社� at public hearing on short-term rentals

Coun. Ron Cannan said he believed the province含羞草研究社檚 approach is more balanced.

含羞草研究社淏etween protecting people含羞草研究社檚 property rights while respecting the rights I believe of the residents in the community.含羞草研究社�

Council has also asked staff to put together a list of properties that may be exempt from the new legislation.

含羞草研究社淲e can imagine that there is a good number of them that would be along the waterfronts and that were built with the purpose of short-term rentals,含羞草研究社� Mayor Dyas added. 含羞草研究社淎nd whether they (provincial government) would consider giving an exemption to this area to help with our tourism demands that we have, not only in Kelowna but in the Okanagan.含羞草研究社�

Dyas, along with councillors Webber, Stack and Mohini Singh voted in favour of moving ahead with changes to short-term rentals in Kelowna, while councillors Lovegrove, Cannan and Charlie Hodge voted against.

Councillors Loyal Wooldridge and Maxine DeHart recused themselves from the discussion and vote citing conflicts of interest.

Wooldridge holds a short-term rental licence, and DeHart is employed by Ramada Hotels and owns two units on Sunset Drive.

READ MORE: Short-term rental rules may not affect Okanagan regional district