The Supreme Court of Canada should 含羞草研究社渟tay in its lane含羞草研究社� when it comes to expanding its judicial authority within Canada含羞草研究社檚 constitutional system, says Justice Malcolm Rowe.

Rowe, one of nine justices on the Supreme Court, said bringing home Canada含羞草研究社檚 constitution in 1982 and the adoption of the Charter of Rights has raised questions about the separation of powers between Parliament, the executive branch of government and the Supreme Court.

In comparison to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has taken a more political stance on issues such as abortion and voting rights, Rowe says he advocates a more carefully thought out move in such a direction.

含羞草研究社淪ome people call me a conservative on the bench, but I feel that is wrong. I am cautious,含羞草研究社� said Rowe.

The justice presented his thoughts in a constitutional lecture he gave Thursday, Sept. 21, at UBC Okanagan.

Rowe offered a history of the evolution of judicial authority in Canada含羞草研究社檚 history, and his assessment of the separation of powers between the branches of government.

含羞草研究社淭his is one of the most fundamental questions in constitutional law,含羞草研究社� said Geoffrey Sigalet, an assistant professor of political science with UBCO含羞草研究社檚 Irving K. Barber Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.

含羞草研究社淎t a time of heightened political polarization regarding questions of rights and the state含羞草研究社檚 reach into citizens含羞草研究社� lives, the question of separation of powers is not merely academic.

含羞草研究社淚t is about which institutions should be settling which kinds of questions as they impact the lives of Canadians.含羞草研究社�

In his presentation, Rowe outlined several reference points that reflect the need for caution in expanding judicial authority.

Rowe said the court lacks the institutional capacity to weigh the pros and cons of any government policy decision-making or to invite public debate on a given issue that Parliament and an elected government have.

含羞草研究社淚 am a little uncomfortable being in a position of making decisions without the capacity to fully flush out the implications of those decisions,含羞草研究社� Rowe said.

He said the legitimacy of the court can also be called into question because, unlike a government, the ultimate authority in the decision-making process is the power of the vote.

He said if you don含羞草研究社檛 support a government-imposed policy, you can express your dissatisfaction at the ballot box, while supreme court judges have a lifetime tenure to ensure legitimacy on the application of law judges decide is not influenced by political partisanship.

含羞草研究社淭enure ensures the Supreme Court has the independence and ability to make legal decisions,含羞草研究社� Rowe said.

含羞草研究社淭here are consequences to expanding the role of the Supreme Court and they must be addressed in a thoughtful manner with sound methodology behind it.含羞草研究社�

He acknowledged the court should not be out of sync with the goals and aspirations of society in Canada, but should lag behind patterns of change to ensure those goals and aspirations are based on sound legal methodology.

Rowe said while many Canadians may look to the Supreme Court to address their frustrations with liberal democracy, he believes governance as it exists today remains effective and accountable.

含羞草研究社淭he ballot box still remains the best way to bring change,含羞草研究社� he said, noting while democracy may be under fire these days as an ineffectual form of government, 含羞草研究社渋t含羞草研究社檚 still the best form of government there is.含羞草研究社�

含羞草研究社淒emocracy is not a sham含羞草研究社� but I feel it is important that the courts stay in their own lane.含羞草研究社�

Rowe brings some unique perspective to those thoughts having worked for the government in Newfoundland and Labrador, including as the head of Newfoundland含羞草研究社檚 public service, coupled with his career as a lawyer and judge.

In his presentation, Rowe made no reference to issues currently facing the U.S. Supreme Court but was asked in a Q&A session after his presentation about current code of ethics issues facing some of his U.S. counterparts.

含羞草研究社淩egarding the code of ethics, we are way ahead of the Americans on this. We actually have a code of ethics in place,含羞草研究社� Rowe said.

含羞草研究社淓thics issue guidelines are one of the first things you are presented with when becoming a (Supreme Court) judge. I have read them.

含羞草研究社淲e are way ahead of the Americans on this one.含羞草研究社�

READ MORE: Kelowna council highlights community含羞草研究社檚 top needs at UBCM

READ MORE: B.C. raises Survivors含羞草研究社� Flag to honour National Day for Truth and Reconciliation