The Canada Border Services Agency plans to implement an app that uses facial recognition technology to keep track of people who have been ordered to be deported from the country.
The mobile reporting app would use biometrics to confirm a person含羞草研究社檚 identity and record their location data when they use the app to check in. Documents obtained through access-to-information indicate that the CBSA has proposed such an app as far back as 2021.
A spokesperson confirmed that an app called ReportIn will be launched this fall. The CBSA said in a followup comment the app could also be used for permanent residents and foreign nationals who are subject to inadmissibility hearings.
Experts are flagging numerous concerns, questioning the validity of user consent and potential secrecy around how the technology makes its decisions.
Each year, about 2,000 people who have been ordered to leave the country fail to show up, meaning the CBSA 含羞草研究社渕ust spend considerable resources investigating, locating and in some cases detaining these clients,含羞草研究社� says a 2021 document.
The agency pitched a smartphone app as an 含羞草研究社渋deal solution.含羞草研究社�
Getting regular updates through the app on a person含羞草研究社檚 含羞草研究社渞esidential address, employment, family status, among other things, will allow the CBSA to have relevant information that can be used to contact and monitor the client for any early indicators of non-compliance,含羞草研究社� it said.
含羞草研究社淎dditionally, given the automation, it is more likely that the client will feel engaged and will recognize the level of visibility the CBSA has on their case.含羞草研究社�
Plus, the document noted: 含羞草研究社淚f a client fails to appear for removal, the information gathered through the app will provide good investigative leads for locating the client.含羞草研究社�
An algorithmic impact assessment for the project 含羞草研究社� not yet posted on the federal government含羞草研究社檚 website 含羞草研究社� said biometric voice technology the CBSA tried using was being phased out due to 含羞草研究社渇ailing technology,含羞草研究社� and it developed the ReportIn app to replace it.
It said a person含羞草研究社檚 含羞草研究社渇acial biometrics and location, provided by sensors and/or the GPS in the mobile device/smartphone含羞草研究社� are recorded through the ReportIn app and then sent to the CBSA含羞草研究社檚 back-end system.
Once people submit photos, a 含羞草研究社渇acial comparison algorithm含羞草研究社� will generate a similarity score to a reference photo.
If the system doesn含羞草研究社檛 confirm a facial match, it triggers a process for officers to investigate the case.
含羞草研究社淭he individuals含羞草研究社� location is also collected every time they report and if the individual fails to comply with their conditions,含羞草研究社� it said. The document noted individuals will not be 含羞草研究社渃onstantly tracked.含羞草研究社�
The app uses technology from Amazon Web Services. That含羞草研究社檚 a choice that grabbed the attention of Brenda McPhail, the director of executive education in McMaster University含羞草研究社檚 public policy in digital society program.
She said while many facial recognition companies submit their algorithms for testing to the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Amazon has never voluntarily done so.
An Amazon Web Services spokesperson said its Amazon Rekognition technology is 含羞草研究社渢ested extensively 含羞草研究社� including by third parties like Credo AI, a company that specializes in Responsible AI, and iBeta Quality Assurance.含羞草研究社�
The spokesperson added that Amazon Rekognition is a 含羞草研究社渓arge-scale cloud-based system and therefore not downloadable as described in the NIST participation guidance.含羞草研究社�
含羞草研究社淭hat is why our Rekognition Face Liveness was instead submitted for testing against industry standards to iBeta Lab,含羞草研究社� which is accredited by the institute as an independent test lab, the spokesperson said.
The CBSA document says the algorithm used will be a trade secret. In a situation that could have life-changing consequences, McPhail asked whether it含羞草研究社檚 含羞草研究社渁ppropriate to use a tool that is protected by trade secrets or proprietary secrets and that denies people the right to understand how decisions about them are truly being made.含羞草研究社�
Kristen Thomasen, an associate professor and chair in law, robotics and society at the University of Windsor, said the reference to trade secrets is a signal there could be legal impediments blocking information about the system.
There含羞草研究社檚 been concern for years about people who are subject to errors in systems being legally prohibited from getting more information because of intellectual property protections, she explained.
CBSA spokesperson Maria Ladouceur said the agency 含羞草研究社渄eveloped this smartphone app to allow foreign nationals and permanent residents subject to immigration enforcement conditions to report without coming in-person to a CBSA office.含羞草研究社�
She said the agency 含羞草研究社渨orked in close consultation含羞草研究社� with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner on the app. 含羞草研究社淓nrolment in ReportIn will be voluntary, and users will need to consent to both using the app, and the use of their likeness to verify their identity.含羞草研究社�
Petra Molnar, the associate director of York University含羞草研究社檚 refugee law lab, said there is a power imbalance between the agency implementing the app and the people on the receiving end.
含羞草研究社淐an a person really, truly consent in this situation where there is a vast power differential?含羞草研究社�
If an individual doesn含羞草研究社檛 consent to participate, they can report in-person as an alternative, Ladouceur said.
Thomasen also cautioned there is a risk of errors with facial recognition technology, and that risk is higher for racialized individuals and people with darker skin.
Molnar said it含羞草研究社檚 含羞草研究社渧ery troubling that there is basically no discussion of 含羞草研究社� human rights impacts in the documents.含羞草研究社�
The CBSA spokesperson said Credo AI reviewed the software for bias against demographic groups, and found a 99.9 per cent facial match rate across six different demographic groups, adding the app 含羞草研究社渨ill be continuously tested after launch to assess accuracy and performance.含羞草研究社�
The final decision will be made by a human, with officers overseeing all submissions, but the experts noted humans tend to trust judgements made by technology.
Thomasen said there is a 含羞草研究社渇airly widely recognized 含羞草研究社� psychological tendency for people to defer to the expertise of the computer system,含羞草研究社� where computer systems are perceived to be less biased or more accurate.
Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press
