含羞草研究社

Skip to content

Judge rejects self-defence claim, convicts B.C. man of killing bear cub

Ryan Owen Millar also guilty of the unlawful killing of cub含羞草研究社檚 mother in Tofino
33111502_web1_230628-UWN-Bears-killed-Tofino_1
(Westerly News file photo)

A provincial court judge has rejected a man含羞草研究社檚 self defence claim in the shooting of two bears in Tofino.

Ryan Owen Millar was convicted of the unlawful killing of a mother bear and young cub on Oct. 14, 2021.

含羞草研究社淚t was not a fair hunt. It was not an ethical hunt. For our purposes in this trial, I conclude and find as a matter of fact, it was not a legal hunt,含羞草研究社 Honourable Judge Alexander Wolf wrote in his reasons for judgment published on June 6. 含羞草研究社淚t appears to me that Mr. Millar含羞草研究社檚 only regret is that he was caught on film and seen by two witnesses.含羞草研究社

During the three-day trial, a witness testified he was visiting Tofino from Vancouver with his spouse and 含羞草研究社渆njoying watching the bears含羞草研究社 from his Airbnb when he saw Millar shoot the bears with a longbow and a crossbow.

含羞草研究社淭he witness said he has 含羞草研究社渂een around hunting most of his life, studied Medieval Studies, and could tell one of the bows was a 含羞草研究社渓ong bow,含羞草研究社櫤卟菅芯可鐫 Wolf wrote. 含羞草研究社淗e then told the court that the accused put an arrow in it and aimed at the bears. He testified that both bears were in a tree. He took a shot and hit one bear, and that bear fell out of a tree.含羞草研究社

The witness said he was about to yell at Millar, but before he could Millar had taken out a cross bow 含羞草研究社渢o finish off the bear.含羞草研究社

含羞草研究社淗e told the court the second bear was still in the tree and 含羞草研究社渏ust looked on含羞草研究社. That is when the accused 含羞草研究社渓oaded the long bow again, and took another shot, and the second bear fell out of the tree,含羞草研究社 Wolf wrote.

The witness said the bear tried to run away but the accused ran after it and took another shot.含羞草研究社

含羞草研究社淭his is not a case where the two bears were killed accidentally,含羞草研究社 Wolf wrote. 含羞草研究社淔or example, they were not hit by a car, without any intent to harm or hurt the bear. There is clear evidence that supports an intentional application of force. There is evidence that clearly supports that there was an intention to maim, wound or kill the bears.含羞草研究社

He added that the witness testified that Millar had made no efforts to scare the bears away before shooting them. The witness also recorded video evidence before calling the RCMP.

An RCMP officer who was the first on scene testified that Millar initially said he 含羞草研究社渄idn含羞草研究社檛 know anything about含羞草研究社 any bears being shot, adding later that he had seen a bear and had scared it away.

Further questioning led to the accused telling the officer that he 含羞草研究社渉ad a haunch of meat on his property and he was worried about his dogs getting hurt.含羞草研究社

Millar further clarified that he had tried to scare the bear off but that it did not react, so he shot it with his bow.

A Conservation Officer also responded to the scene and testified at trial that Millar含羞草研究社檚 recounting of the events contained inconsistencies.

含羞草研究社淗e seemed to intentionally create the impression that the bear was a 含羞草研究社榩roblem含羞草研究社 bear. He used the word a couple of times and eventually said it was 含羞草研究社榥ot a good bear, just seeing it come at me like that,含羞草研究社櫤卟菅芯可鐫 said the CO. 含羞草研究社淲ith respect to the incident on October 14, 2021, the accused described the experience and used very specific words. 含羞草研究社淣ear death experience含羞草研究社 was one phrase he used.含羞草研究社

A wildlife veterinarian also testified at trial and confirmed that the mother bear was lactating and had been shot with four arrows.

含羞草研究社淒r. Thacker described in detail the angles that the arrows entered the bear. At least one of the entry wounds was consistent with being shot while the bear was elevated, such as in a tree,含羞草研究社 Wolf wrote.

含羞草研究社淏ased on her expertise she said there was likely a much smaller bear cub, weighing no more than 50 pounds, under the age of 12 months with the sow.含羞草研究社

Wolf added there was no evidence to suggest either bear was 含羞草研究社渋n any way acting aggressively or threatening harm to person, place or thing含羞草研究社 and that he did not believe Millar含羞草研究社檚 recollection of events.

含羞草研究社淭o be clear, without any hesitation, and to be as polite as possible, I conclude that his version of events is fabricated,含羞草研究社 Wolf wrote.

Wolf found Millar guilty of illegally killing the two bears and sentencing will take place in September.



andrew.bailey@westerlynews.ca

Like us on and follow us on

READ MORE:

READ MORE:

READ MORE:



Andrew Bailey

About the Author: Andrew Bailey

I arrived at the Westerly News as a reporter and photographer in January 2012.
Read more



(or

含羞草研究社

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }