A Surrey Pretrial centre inmate backed by the West Coast Prison Justice Society is challenging the provincial government含羞草研究社檚 use of the balance of probabilities standard of proof in prison disciplinary hearings on grounds it violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Christopher Trotchie and the not-for-profit society maintain the government should require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Justice Karen Douglas rendered her on Oct. 27, in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver. She denied the government含羞草研究社檚 application to strike the challenge, having found the plaintiffs含羞草研究社� case is not destined to fail and should proceed to trial.

含羞草研究社淭his action does not challenge the Act or the Regulation. Rather, it challenges administrative decision makers含羞草研究社� use of the balance of probabilities standard of proof at prison inmate disciplinary hearings.含羞草研究社�

At issue, Douglas noted, is whether using the balance of probabilities standard in prison disciplinary hearings deprives inmates of 含羞草研究社渢heir liberty and security of the person in a manner that is contrary to the presumption of innocence.含羞草研究社�

For its part, the provincial government submitted that using the balance of probabilities standard does not do this because presumption of innocence doesn含羞草研究社檛 apply to correctional centre disciplinary hearings.

It argued that the rationale for presumption of innocence is to guard against wrongful convictions and submitted that this consideration is unique to criminal law but does not apply to inmate discipline, the judge noted.

The trial is set for Feb. 12.

含羞草研究社淚 conclude it is not plain and obvious that the plaintiffs含羞草研究社� claim is bound to fail. Accordingly, I decline to strike this claim,含羞草研究社� Douglas decided.

Douglas also noted in her reasons that Trotchie has been imprisoned in several BC Corrections含羞草研究社� institutions and has 含羞草研究社渟ignificant experience with the Province含羞草研究社檚 prison disciplinary regime.含羞草研究社�